I’ve been working on this one for a while. Pretty happy with it, as its a cobbled together mix of a multitude of sources, based heavily on the T6 (one of my favourite raid instances of all time) set without the creepy eyes on the shoulders. Head: Valorous Scourgestalker Headpiece (Ulduar Normal) OR Malefactor’s Eyepatch (Quest reward) works well too. Shoulders: Flamewalker’s Spaulders (Heroic Firelands) Chest: GronnStalkers Chestguard + Tabard of Summer Flames – does the Scarlet Crusader Tabard still drop? That would look awesome… Hands: GronnStalkers Gloves (Hyjal) Belt: GronnStalkers Belt (Sunwell) Legs: GronnStalkers Leggings (Black Temple) Feet: GronnStalkers Boots (Sunwell) Weapon: Miracoran, the Vehement Chord (Heroic ToT), OR Dagryn’s Discarded Longbow (SoO Normal) OR XYZ (An interesting match, and way easier to obtain) Another one is in the works – one more drop to go…
A couple of Hunter related posts in the works. In the mean time, here is some country to distract you from just how shockingly bad I have been at posting recently…
Back in the day (before a bunch of idiots exploited some specific pets to cheese Dragon Soul), there were some pets that a wiley Hunter could tame and the visual auras applied to pets were maintained. My favourite example is the oil stained wolf from Borean Tundra, shown in the header image of this post.
From what I can tell, many creatures out in the world have visual auras applied to them to alter their appearance. It works well – not all looks of creatures can be provided by textures, and so auras is a natural fit to maximise reuse of game assets. With me so far? The trouble is, that buffs and rebuffs are also classified as auras. So, when a Hunter tames a pet all auras are now removed. Meaning our classy wolf above reverts to your average every day wolf. Sad Kaybs.
Now to be clear, the reasons for yanking visual auras back when people were exploiting pet auras were solid. I would have fixed the issue too. Raid crews were stacking a 20% melee and ranged haste buff given by taming a specific pet and blowing away raid bosses. Not cool, man.
However, I would also have recognised the joy that part of the player base was getting from these pets and found a way to tag allowable auras as visual, and allow them to remain on tamed pets. I hope one day Blizzard takes a look at it, and allows visual auras to come back, but I am certainly not holding my breath.
And a little Hunter waits…..
… and waits.
Well, it was a while coming, but this is one of the Hunter transmog efforts I have made that I kinda like. It is inspired by an set I saw on the MMO forums by a druid who had created an amazing UI and showed his Hunter under the same ui. It also had the Dragon-Quake shoulders, and that got me thinking.
To be honest, I like the current T16 enough that I pretty much stick with it, but I threw it back together and here you go.
- Head: Malefactors Eyepatch [Link: wowhead]
- Shoulders: Dragon-Quake Shoulderguards [Link: wowhead]
- Cloak: Fen-Yu, Fury of Xuen [Link: wowhead]
- Chest: Chestguard of the Lasher [Link: wowhead]
- Gloves: Giantstalker’s Gloves [Link: wowhead]
- Belt (Not happy with this piece): Belt of the Dying Diemetradon [Link: wowhead]
- Legs: Greaves of Desolation [Link: wowhead]
- Boots: Giantstalker’s Boots [Link: wowhead]
- Bow: Striker’s Mark [Link: wowhead]
- I want to find a better belt, and try out the Steelspine Faceguard [Link: wowhead]. I suspect its colour may not go with the set though.
Back soon, I promise. Working on some things. More tank notes will be coming shortly. Here is an awesome Country track to tide you over in the meantime…
Here’s a handy little macro for announcing your Blingtron placement in General chat. Your mileage may vary with language and channel numbers, but it should be enough to get you started.
#showtooltip Blingtron 4000
/run local x,y=GetPlayerMapPosition(“player”)local s=format(“(%i , %i)”,x*100,y*100)SendChatMessage((select(2,GetItemInfo(87214)))..” is out at “..GetMinimapZoneText()..” “..s..”. Good Luck!”,”CHANNEL”,7,1)
/use Blingtron 4000
It places your Blingtron, and the following message is posted to General Chat (Location and coords change according to your position)
While pew pewing my way through an LFR the other night Gantagious from Skywall dropped a throwaway comment that immediately struck a chord with me. I don’t recall the exact words, but it was something along the lines of: “Wouldn’t it be cool if there was a like function kind of like the opposite of /ignore which would get you grouped with good people more often?”
Wouldn’t it be cool if you could favorite people (just like you can /ignore them) and you’d be more likely to be randomly grouped with your favorites? This, alone, would be awesome, but the idea could go much, much further and start to add some accountability to your actions in WoW.
The friends and RealID offering in WoW has always struck me as a very shallow social element in what is supposed to be a highly social game, with the rest being ignored as a “that’s what guilds are for” type deal. Guilds are great, don’t get me wrong, but there is more to the game than the group of people that you have typing in green in your in game IRC channel.
What if you could rate people (1-5 stars for example) against the following categories:
- Skill at current role
- Personal conduct
With the resulting list of people filterable by you as pseudo friends list for pugs and planned dungeons or raids, but also used behind the scenes to influence both party’s likelihood of being grouped together again? This to me would start to build micro communities out of the inherently anonymous and transactional environment that is LFR/LFD/Random BGs (Let’s call it LF(X)).
Underneath it all, Blizzard could better track the bad stuff:
- Kicks suggested, voted and received
- Ignores etc
…and find ways to systematically encourage better behaviour. Much like sites linking to each other help to police site relevancy in search engines, similar smarts could be used to make the system relatively self policing (some one giving heaps of bad reviews, yet receiving many bad reviews from 5 star players, would probably signify this person as a lightning rod for bad behaviour, for example)
PvP could benefit from this too – did someone swoop in and assist you while out in the world? Or perhaps an awesome player in a random BG and you teamed up to wreck havoc. If you rate each other, chances are you’ll start appearing together in Random BGs more and more. Seems legit to me.
With a system like this in place, your random groups would start to align towards the people who you’re rated (and vice versa) and the social side of the game would start to re-emerge. It would be awesome to to start seeing more of the people (albeit strangers) that you enjoyed playing with in LF(X) runs. On the back of a social circle forming from a feature like this, guilds, pugs, or planned runs could naturally coalesce.
In a full system like this, you could also be rated and commented on, to elevate your profile and standing in the community. This, combined with Proving Ground scores, and maybe some data-mined metrics from action runs you have participated in could start to provide a great player profile offering.
Back in the day, I formed one of these communities by using a private channel in game (this was back in Vanilla). People who you rated from a random run (Normally by spamming trade with LF2MLBRS type acronyms) were invited via whisper to a channel where runs of known good players started naturally forming outside of guild alliances (or obligations). It was awesome! On a wider scale as an in game system it could, quite literally, change the game for many casual players.
Services like OpenRaid provide this kind of community to some extent, but there is something inherently hard (or medium at the very least) core about an external service like that which would (I suspect) prevent many “normal” players from using it – speaking personally I have been a WoW fan since vanilla and have only just joined.
The folks at Blizzard have been very open about the challenges of LFR level content and the behaviour many people are displaying it, as well as the erosion or demise of the social aspects of these tiers of content. Could this be the answer? There are many possible solutions to this problem but I think this could be a real contender.